October vs Devin

A shared canvas for your chosen tools, compared with Devin’s software delivery workflow.

Checked 2026-11-02 · 4 official sources · Read the sources

October is a shared workspace around the agents, applications and people involved in a project. Devin combines software-engineering tasks with an editor, shell, browser and code-review workflow. It now offers cloud sessions, a local CLI and Devin Desktop. Desktop can run third-party ACP agents with those providers’ billing, so describing Devin as cloud-only or restricted to one model misses part of the current product. October keeps independent agents, applications and human collaborators on a shared canvas, with Kanban and code views for other ways to follow the work. Devin organizes coding, local sessions and cloud handoffs inside its engineering workflow. Compare the review surface and coordination you want around a real change.

Choose October if

You want independently chosen coding tools and human teammates on a shared canvas.
You want connected sessions to exchange questions and results through Agent Intercom.
You want to inspect live apps and agent work together, with canvas, Kanban and code views.

Choose Devin if

You want an integrated coding, testing and pull-request workflow.
You want local work and longer cloud tasks within Devin’s own product.
You want its Desktop ACP workflow for compatible third-party coding agents.

At a glance

Side by side.

October and Devin: differences that matter
What matters	October	Devin
Main workflow	Coordinate coding agents, applications and people around a project.	Implement, test, review and hand off software-engineering tasks. [1]
Working surface	A shared visual canvas, plus Kanban and code views.	Devin’s coding session, editor, shell, browser and review tools. [1]
Where tasks run	Local and connected cloud work in the same workspace, subject to the service and plan.	Cloud sessions, local CLI work and Devin Desktop. [1]
Agent coordination	Connected independent sessions exchange questions and results through Agent Intercom.	Multiple engineering tasks and ACP-compatible third-party agents in Desktop. [3]
Tools and accounts	Bring supported coding harnesses with their existing provider accounts.	Compatible agents can use their provider accounts and bill those providers directly. [3]
Review and control	Inspect agent sessions, live app previews and results with your collaborators.	Inspect code, tests and pull requests through the engineering workflow. [1]

What changes in the day-to-day workflow

October keeps independent agents, applications and human collaborators on a shared canvas, with Kanban and code views for other ways to follow the work. Devin organizes coding, local sessions and cloud handoffs inside its engineering workflow. Compare the review surface and coordination you want around a real change.

Compare a real review, not a model checklist

Provider choice is now shared ground: Devin Desktop supports third-party ACP agents, while October lets you coordinate independently chosen harnesses. Put the same change through both workflows. In October, keep agent sessions, the running application and the teammate reviewing it together. In Devin, evaluate its coding and cloud-handoff path. The better fit is the environment in which you can judge the change clearly.

Questions about October.

Why use October if I already use Devin?

October adds a shared place to supervise coding agents, applications and people. It fits a project where the implementation, preview and review involve several independent tools.

Does October automatically import my existing agent work?

Use October’s documented session and tool integrations. A product appearing in this guide does not imply automatic import of its tasks, cloud sessions or conversation history.

What should I try first in October?

Start a small project with two supported agent sessions and a preview. Compare how easily you can understand their progress and review the result.

Sources & review

Checked against the official pages below on 2026-11-02. Features, availability, and plans can change. October information: product overview and current plans. Suggest a correction.

Product names and logos belong to their respective owners. Their inclusion identifies the products being compared.